As Americans await the results of the presidential election, the crypto market is in a wait-and-see stance. Recent insights from Santiment examine where candidates Donald Trump and Kamala Harris stand on crypto and how elections have influenced prices in past cycles.
According to Santiment’s report, Trump’s approach has largely resonated with crypto enthusiasts. At the Bitcoin 2024 conference, he proposed creating a national Bitcoin reserve and pledged to form a crypto advisory council.
His plan to remove SEC leadership reflects his desire to transform the regulatory landscape and possibly make it a more digital asset-friendly environment. At the same time, the family’s establishment of World Liberty Financial, a crypto exchange, shows the Trump camp’s full commitment to the domain of crypto.
On the other hand, Kamala Harris has emphasized regulatory stability and consumer protection. In 2024, she introduced plans to establish a framework for digital assets while meeting with industry leaders to discuss blockchain’s role in innovation. Her approach appeals to those seeking a balanced strategy that encourages growth without compromising investor safety.
Crypto market trends during past U.S. elections
Historical data has shown how elections have impacted crypto trends. Immediately after the 2016 victory of Trump, there was short-term turbulence in volativity, though markets quickly stabilized as the president-elect’s position came into focus. In 2020, with the victory of Biden, market spirits were high, though the broader financial trends were hard to isolate in a post-COVID environment.
Throughout the 2024 elections, finance moves and repeating the same things are some of the important things markets are following. Non. Each candidate’s stance could mean changes in the degree of crypto regulation. If Trump wins, traders might expect an easier regulatory environment due to some pro-market policies, whereas if Harris emerges on top, a firm regulatory framework may emerge.
Hence, the connection between cryptos and politics never ceases to be complex. The overwhelming importance of digital assets indicates that future policy will create the nuances. The result of the conflict may further ignite the discussions of where the boundaries of accountability should lie and how to incorporate the growing influence of cryptos in both domestic and global markets.
Related | Solana grabs $5.7M in inflows as institutional demand grows
